Cummings v. Civil Service Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
Because the civil service commission acted well within its discretion in discharging Deputy Probation Officer Earl Cummings, Jr., for misusing his authority, violating confidential records, and lying to other governmental officials and his own superiors, we affirm the judgment.
We also affirm the principles Justice Johnson expressed recently and well for this unanimous court: a deputy probation officer’s “job is a position of trust and the public has a right to the highest standard of behavior from those they invest with the power and authority of a law enforcement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pollak v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Haney v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Davis v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Cummings v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Oduyale v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.