Legal Opinion
Haney v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 2003No. B153530PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
A Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Board of Rights found appellant Bryan Haney guilty of absenting himself from his duty post without authorization and submitting a daily field activities report, which he knew, or should have known, contained false information, on May 25, 1998. A majority of the three-person board recommended that appellant be removed from duty as a police officer. The chief of police accepted the recommendation and terminated appellant’s employment. Appellant petitioned for administrative mandamus. The court denied his petition to compel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Barber v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. SwinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Dresser v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Telish v. Cal. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Pedro v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Richardson v. City & County of San Francisco Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Airborne San Diego, LLC v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Collins v. City of L.A. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.