Legal Opinion
PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 22, 2016No. 2015-1364PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
PPC Broadband, Inc. appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“Board”) final written decision in an inter partes review (“IPR”) concluding that claims 10-25 of U.S. Patent No. 8,323,060 would have been obvious. Because we conclude that the Board erred in its construction of “reside around,” we vacate and remand for further proceedings.
Background
A coaxial cable has an inner electrical conductor (often called the “signal” or “signal feed”) and an outer electrical conductor (often called the “ground return” or “ground”).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Randall Mfg. v. ReaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Knowles Electronics LLC v. Cirrus Logic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Simo Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong Ucloudlink NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Nobel Biocare Services Ag v. Instradent USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.