Legal Opinion

Kubina v. Nichols

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is for partition of real estate. There was a trial to the court. The court made and entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law. From the judgment entered thereon, the defendant Raymond W. Nichols appeals.

No bill of exceptions was settled. The case is therefore for decision upon the record. The findings are full and in detail and specifically cover every issue made by the pleadings. The only question for determination, therefore, is whether the findings sustain the judgment. Meyers v. Thorpe, 227 Wis. 200, 278 N. W. 462. That they do is plain. The story disclosed by them is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deery v. McClintockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Meyers v. ThorpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Scheiner v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jezo v. JezoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. O'Connell v. O'ConnellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  4. Rainer v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Indra v. WigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API