Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. O'Connell

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 1, 2005No. 04-0895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.

¶ 1. After a partition action, Gerald and Maxine O'Connell appeal a judgment and an order denying them reimbursement for improvements they made to the property over the course of their co-tenancy first with Gerald's brother Emmett and his wife, and then with Gerald's nephews, Emmett, Jr. and David. They also appeal the circuit court's award of costs and attorney fees to be paid from the proceeds of the property's sale. Gerald and Maxine argue that the circuit court erred when it concluded their claim for equitable reimbursement was cut off by a warranty deed, executed on February 8, 1994,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Milwaukee v. KilgoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Milas v. Labor Ass'n of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yorgan v. DurkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. First American Title Insurance v. DahlmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. OglesbyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Fohr v. FohrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API