Indra v. Wiggins
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
As tbe appeal is presented tbe chief complaint of tbe plaintiff against tbe decree of tbe court is that it charges her share in tbe joint property with one half of tbe enhanced value thereof, wbicb increase in value was found by tbe court to have resulted from improvements placed on tbe ground and paid for by the defendant J. H. Wiggins. Her contention is that, although she contributed nothing to any improvement placed on tbe bare acre of ground, the value of which at all times pertinent was but $150, sbe is, nevertheless, entitled to one half of the value in excess thereof, all of which…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ford v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Cleveland v. MilnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
- Armor v. FreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Thorn v. ThornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Burton v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Karen Wynkoop v. Gerard StratthausSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Massey v. HrostekSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Wiggins v. WigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Mahon v. MahonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.