Legal Opinion

Richardson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1978No. 77-1621PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

The Secretary of Labor brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., alleging that defendant Hamburg Shirt Corporation was in violation of § 7 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207, for failing to properly compensate its employees for overtime work. The Secretary sought injunctive relief and recovery of back wages allegedly owed to affected employees. Those employees were paid under a contractual agreement entitled “Fixed Salary Agreement for Fluctuating Hours.”1 The district court, in rejecting the Secretary’s claim, held that the contract was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Mumbower v. CallicottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Jeanette Yadav v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. James Alfred GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Timothy Paul Harvey, David Allen Harvey, and James Loren Harvey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. James Edward OsmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API