Legal Opinion

Timothy Paul Harvey, David Allen Harvey, and James Loren Harvey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1988No. 87-5185PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Three brothers, Timothy, James, and David Harvey, filed motions in district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking to set aside guilty pleas. They claim: the guilty pleas were taken in violation of Rule 11 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and not voluntarily and knowingly made; they received ineffective assistance from their court-appointed counsel; and their guilty pleas would not have been entered but for their lack of knowledge, and the ineffective assistance and coercion of trial counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Mustafa A. AbdullahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Ricky Lee Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. State v. LangfordMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. Russell B. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Donnie M. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API