Legal Opinion

Genovese v. A. Lenobel, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 12, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs to either party upon this appeal, and judgment directed dismissing both the complaint and counterclaim, with appropriate costs to the defendant.

The plaintiff breached his contract to purchase an automobile from the defendant. He, therefore, would have no right to recover any payment he had made under that contract. (Lawrence v. Miller, 86 N. Y. 131; Keystone Hardware Corporation v. Tague, 246 id. 79.) Nor is the plaintiff entitled to recover for the old automobile which he turned over to the defendant. That automobile was taken in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simms v. BoveeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Smith Motor Car Corp. v. Universal Credit Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  3. Mazzeo v. Berkeley Motor Sales, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
  4. Babbitt v. Wides Motor Sales Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API