Legal Opinion
Smith Motor Car Corp. v. Universal Credit Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 1, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhalen, J.
This is an action in replevin to recover a 1932 Ford car. The plaintiff is a dealer in Chevrolet automobiles and used *101cars and was represented throughout this transaction by its president, Smith. A man named Winet was the owner under a conditional bill of sale of the Ford car in question, upon which there was a balance due to the defendant, an automobile finance company. Winet had a discussion with Smith regarding the purchase of a new Chevrolet car and arranged to turn in the Ford as part payment. While the negotiations were going on the defendant repossessed the Ford car because of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Rapp v. Mabbett Motor Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Genovese v. A. Lenobel, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
- Austin v. Heermance Storage & Refrigerating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- O'Connor v. LockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schnitzer v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Bonded Freightways, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Franjo Transport, Inc. v. B & K Fleet Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996