Wm. P. Goldman & Bros. v. Goldstein
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Levy, J.:
The plaintiff in this action, a manufacturer of men’s clothing, seeks an injunction against the defendants, a copartnership, restraining them from infringing upon its trade-mark. The plaintiff’s device consists of “ G. G. G.” in script form, while the defendants employ two script “ Gs ” with the “ & ” sign between them. The plaintiff is a larg'e concern doing extensive advertising, while the defendants have a much smaller business, but also do some advertising. Plaintiff’s use dates back to 1909, while defendants did not adopt their trade-mark until 1919.
It is evident that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- W. B. Manufacturing Co. v. RubensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Frank v. SleeperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Omag Optik Und Mechanik A. G. v. WeinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Winthrop Chemical Co. v. BlackmanNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Rosenberg v. RosenthalNew York Supreme Court · 1929