Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Rosenthal

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is an application for an order restraining and enjoining the defendants and each of them, pending the outcome of this action, from using the name “ American Floor Covering Co.” or any similar name in connection with the sale of carpets, rugs, linoleums, oilcloths or any other floor covering, or exhibiting the said trade name on the windows, signs, billheads, letterheads or any other stationery of the defendants. Upon the call of the calendar the defendants defaulted and the motion was granted. Upon consent, however, and with the approval of the court, this *283default is now opened and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Wm. P. Goldman & Bros. v. GoldsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amusement Securities Corp. v. Academy Pictures Distributing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Omag Optik Und Mechanik A. G. v. WeinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Pavia v. MedcalfeNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API