Rosenberg v. Rosenthal
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This is an application for an order restraining and enjoining the defendants and each of them, pending the outcome of this action, from using the name “ American Floor Covering Co.” or any similar name in connection with the sale of carpets, rugs, linoleums, oilcloths or any other floor covering, or exhibiting the said trade name on the windows, signs, billheads, letterheads or any other stationery of the defendants. Upon the call of the calendar the defendants defaulted and the motion was granted. Upon consent, however, and with the approval of the court, this *283default is now opened and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wm. P. Goldman & Bros. v. GoldsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amusement Securities Corp. v. Academy Pictures Distributing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- Omag Optik Und Mechanik A. G. v. WeinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Pavia v. MedcalfeNew York Supreme Court · 1965