Legal Opinion · Dissent

Friezo v. Friezo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 6, 2007No. SC 17456Published

1DissentNorcott, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court improperly determined that the parties’ prenuptial agreement (agreement) was unenforceable. I also conclude that the trial court improperly presumed that the parties were entitled to an equal distribution of the marital property. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent, and would *207reverse the judgment of the trial court only with regard to the financial orders.

I

Like the majority, I begin with the first claim of the defendant, David Friezo, namely, that the trial court improperly concluded that the agreement executed by the parties on…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Alvarez v. New Haven Register, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API