Friezo v. Friezo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentNorcott, J.
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court improperly determined that the parties’ prenuptial agreement (agreement) was unenforceable. I also conclude that the trial court improperly presumed that the parties were entitled to an equal distribution of the marital property. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent, and would *207reverse the judgment of the trial court only with regard to the financial orders.
I
Like the majority, I begin with the first claim of the defendant, David Friezo, namely, that the trial court improperly concluded that the agreement executed by the parties on…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Alvarez v. New Haven Register, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.