State v. Booher
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The question dispositive of this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury on the question of defendant’s guilt of a first degree sexual offense. We conclude that it was not.
The state’s evidence consisted almost entirely of the testimony of Timothy Moore. According to Moore, he first met defendant on 30 May 1980 at a “Welcome Aboard” meeting upon Moore’s arrival at Camp Lejeune. At the time of trial Moore was a twenty-one-year-old sergeant in the Marine Corps with three years and two months’ service in the Corps. During the Welcome Aboard meeting,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Love v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. MoormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.