Monroe Branstad v. State of Iowa Ex Rel. Natural Resource Commission and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ZAGER, Justice.
In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the State’s role is “primarily adjudicative” when the Natural Resource Commission decides a contested case following an investigation and subsequent decision by the Department of Natural Resources to assess restitution. We find that the State’s role in this case was primarily adjudicative, precluding an award of attorney fees. See Iowa Code § 625.29(1)(6) (2011). Therefore, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the. judgment of the district court denying attorney fees.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
The Iowa…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Larry D. Schaefer and Elaine M. Schaefer v. Dale L. Putnam, Putnam Law Office, and SMP, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Star Equipment, Ltd. v. State of Iowa, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Botsko v. Davenport Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jbs Swift & Company and American Zurich Insurance Company v. Rosalva OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Beverly Gardiner Nance v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Daniel Kline, Frank Sories, and Amaris McCann v. Southgate Property Management, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Dennis L. Smith v. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.