Marks v. Culmer
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district, and from an order refusing a new trial. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.
1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.
Tbis cause was commenced in tbe first district court at Provo, by Wolf Marks and Afina Marks, against William H. Culmer, Jabez G. Sutherland, John T. Sullivan, Daniel S. Dana, Delos Lombard, Harvey K. Tompkins and Belle Tompkins. Tbe complaint alleges that tbe plaintiffs *420are husband and wife, and tbat tbe defendants Harvey and Belle Tompkins are busband and wife, and tbat eacb of tbe said defendants, individually, participated in tbe wrongs therein stated; and, for tbe first cause of action, it alleges “tbat on tbe 19tb day of December, A. D. 1887, tbe said defendants unlawfully, with force…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Averill v. WilliamsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- People of the Territory ex rel. Marks v. HillsUtah Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Park v. Moorman Mfg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- United States v. HatahleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Culmer v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Egelhoff v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Bel Courtyard Investments, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.