Legal Opinion
United States v. Hatahley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1958No. 5717PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us for the second time. It was brought by the plaintiffs, who are Indians of the Navajo tribe, under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b) and 2671 et seq.), to recover $100,000 as damages for the loss of horses and burros which they allege were wrongfully and unlawfully seized and destroyed in the State of Utah by agents of the United States Bureau of Land Management. The trial court found for the plaintiffs and entered a lump sum judgment of $100,000. We reversed on the grounds that the horses and burros in question…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Honorable Willis W. Ritter, Chief Judge of the United States District Courtfor the District of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. J.B.J. Feedyards, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Lively v. RufusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.