Legal Opinion

Driscoll v. People

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1882PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Information for robbery. Respondent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Driscoll was convicted. of robbery, tbe person charged to have been robbed being one ’William Algram, and the crime alleged to have been committed, being described as committed in East Saginaw. When sworn, Algram, who lived at East Saginaw, and is a laborer, testified to an acquaintance with Driscoll, who had formerly been a saloon-keeper in East Saginaw, but for some two years had lived at Earwell. His story was that on the night of the assault Driscoll was visiting East Saginaw, and in company with Algram visited several saloons, drinking a number of times. Finally, as they were in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Saunders v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Clemens v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. People v. McGillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FalknerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. EddingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API