Romano v. Sacknoff
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 365 Mass. 755 (1974). A motion under Rule 12(b) (6) should not be allowed “unless it appears to a certainty that [the claiming pleader] is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim” (empha*863sis deleted). 2A Moore, Federal Practice 2274 (2d ed. 1975). Cf. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U. S. 41, 45-46 (1957). See Charbonnier v. Amico, 367 Mass. 146, 154, n.14 (1975). 1. For the purpose of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Jones v. Brockton Public Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Keene Lumber Co. v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Spinner v. NuttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Kipp v. KuekerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Coolidge Bank & Trust Co. v. First Ipswich Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Fraelick v. PerkettPR, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.