Legal Opinion

Romano v. Sacknoff

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 8, 1976PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 365 Mass. 755 (1974). A motion under Rule 12(b) (6) should not be allowed “unless it appears to a certainty that [the claiming pleader] is entitled to no relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of the claim” (empha*863sis deleted). 2A Moore, Federal Practice 2274 (2d ed. 1975). Cf. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U. S. 41, 45-46 (1957). See Charbonnier v. Amico, 367 Mass. 146, 154, n.14 (1975). 1. For the purpose of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Jones v. Brockton Public Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Keene Lumber Co. v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Spinner v. NuttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Kipp v. KuekerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Coolidge Bank & Trust Co. v. First Ipswich Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Fraelick v. PerkettPR, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API