Legal Opinion

Coolidge Bank & Trust Co. v. First Ipswich Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 11, 1980PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Although improbable in the extreme, the broad facts alleged by the defendants in their amended counterclaim make out the framework of a legally cognizable grievance if, as we must, we draw all necessary inferences in favor of the pleader. Charbonnier v. Amico, 367 Mass. 146, 152-153 (1975). Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 98 (1977). Howard v. G. H. Dunn Ins. Agency, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 868 (1976).

Applying that generous test, the counterclaim seems to say: that Coolidge Bank and Trust Company (the bank) made an oral offer to lend the defendant First Ipswich Company, Incorporated (First Ipswich),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Kipp v. KuekerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Brookhaven Housing Coalition v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Brum v. Town of DartmouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Lambert v. Fleet National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Jenkins v. JenkinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Trioli v. Town of SudburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. MUNICIPAL LIGHT CO, ASHBURNHAM v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API