Legal Opinion

FINK v. BISHOP

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 21, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00566Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE JOHN W. FINK, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 23-566 (CPO/MJS) JONATHAN L. BISHOP, et al., Defendants. O P I N I O N & O R D E R This matter comes before the Court on the motions filed by pro se plaintiff John W. Fink (“Plaintiff”) to recover the costs and fees he incurred from the formal service of summonses on defendants Kaydon Stanzione, Praxis Technologies, Inc., and Praxis Technologies Corporation (the “Praxis Defendants”) [ECF No. 122], and defendant Edgelink, Inc. (“Edgelink”) [ECF No. 123]. The Court has received and reviewed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. 72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 966, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 1125 Caroline P. Ayres v. Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A. Robert Jacobs, Individually and as an Agent/senior Partner Thomas C. Crumplar, Individually and as an Agent/senior Partner Douglas B. Canfield, Individually and as an Agent/senior PartnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Melvin Richardson v. Superintendent Coal Township SCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Estate of Darulis v. GarateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. NuttallDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API