Melvin Richardson v. Superintendent Coal Township S
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIBAS, Circuit Judge.
Melvin Richardson was denied counsel for part of his state-court sentencing. But neither his post-sentencing lawyer nor his state-habeas lawyer challenged that denial of counsel. Now, on federal habeas, he seeks to challenge his post-sentencing lawyer's ineffectiveness.
To do so, he has to overcome both lawyers' failures. He must attack his post-sentencing lawyer's failure to raise the denial of counsel as itself a denial of effective counsel. But he can do that only if he had a right to counsel at the post-sentencing stage. And, before attacking his post-sentencing…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- William Rogers v. Tony MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Clark v. NoethDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Carl Simon v. Government of the Virgin IslanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Roy Moses v. District Attorney PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- Karlsen v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.