Legal Opinion

Melvin Richardson v. Superintendent Coal Township S

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 2, 2018No. 15-4105PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIBAS, Circuit Judge.

Melvin Richardson was denied counsel for part of his state-court sentencing. But neither his post-sentencing lawyer nor his state-habeas lawyer challenged that denial of counsel. Now, on federal habeas, he seeks to challenge his post-sentencing lawyer's ineffectiveness.

To do so, he has to overcome both lawyers' failures. He must attack his post-sentencing lawyer's failure to raise the denial of counsel as itself a denial of effective counsel. But he can do that only if he had a right to counsel at the post-sentencing stage. And, before attacking his post-sentencing…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. William Rogers v. Tony MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  2. Clark v. NoethDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  3. Carl Simon v. Government of the Virgin IslanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. Roy Moses v. District Attorney PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  5. Karlsen v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API