Legal Opinion

Pantasote Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 18, 1910No. 38PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Transferred from the United States Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, Abstract 22034 (T. D. 30086).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yeies, Judge

This case comes up by transfer from the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York.

This merchandise, described in the appraiser’s return as millboards, -is imported, first, rectangular sheets or boards, 2 feet by 4 to 6 feet by 12; second, similar boards glued or joined together t'o make greater dimension of surface; third, similar boards bent or curved to a concave form. They were assessed for duty as manufactures of paper at 35 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 407 of the tariff act of 1897. The importer claims they are properly *48dutiable under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morris, Mann & Reilly Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Doap Leun Hong Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API