Legal Opinion

Doap Leun Hong Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1932No. 3449Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeneoot, Judge

Appellants, in 1927 and 1928, imported certain merchandise at the port of San Francisco which was classified and assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 34 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as drugs advanced in value at ten per centum ad valorem.

Appellants protested, claiming the same to be properly dutiable as ■crude drugs under paragraph 1567, or, in the alternative, as crude vegetable substances under paragraph 1622 of said act.

Upon the trial the lower court overruled the protests and entered judgment accordingly. From such judgment this appeal is taken.

The competing paragraphs are as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. GandolfiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. O. G. Hempstead & SonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. United States v. ScheringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API