Legal Opinion

Morris, Mann & Reilly Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1924No. 2419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The contest here arises out of the classification of certain manufactures of highly scented soap, fabricated into the form of statuettes, small vases, and other similar articles. The collector classified them as toilet soap under paragraph 82 of the tariff act of 1922, which paragraph is as follows:

Soap: Castile, 15 per centum ad valorem; toilet, 30 per centum ad valorem; all other soap and soap powder not specially provided for, 15 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested and claimed them to be dutiable under said paragraph as soap not specially provided for, or, alternatively, under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Horsfield v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Pantasote Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shallus Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API