Legal Opinion
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated as of March 1, 1982
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1989No. C4-88-1637PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order, amended order and judgment construing an indenture of trust. The appellant contends the indenture of trust was not ambiguous and claims the district court improperly imposed contractual obligations not found in the trust instrument and related documents. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
The Diamond Tool and Horseshoe Company (Diamond) located in Duluth, Minnesota was offered for sale in 1981. The Triangle Corporation of Delaware (Triangle) submitted an application to the City of Duluth (City) requesting financial assistance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- City of Pipestone v. MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Karim v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atkins v. GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998