Legal Opinion
City of Pipestone v. Madsen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1970No. 42314PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This case was brought to establish the validity of the action of the city of Pipestone, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, and of members of the city council of said city to effect the sale of $3,000,000 in revenue bonds to finance the purchase of land located near the city and the erection of a meat packing plant thereon. Defendant, the mayor of the city, contends that the statute under which the city council has proceeded, Minn. St. c. 474, the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, is unconstitutional.
The Municipal Industrial Development Act (hereinafter referred…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- People Ex Rel. City of Salem v. McMackinIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, International Ass'n of Fire FightersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Jardon v. Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.