Sprinkle v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina.
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, District Judge.
This case was decided by this court at its November term, 1905 (141 Fed. 811, 73 C. C. A. 285), and is now under consideration upon a petition for rehearing granted at the instance of T. M. Angle and William Young, two of the defendants, the defendant Sprinkle having- acquiesced in the judgment of the court.
The case is briefly this: B. F. Sprinkle and the petitioners Angle and Young, together with H. C. Sprinkle and J. T. Sprinkle, were indicted for violations of the internal revenue laws; the indictment containing 10 counts, the first charging the persons named with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Boston & Albany Railroad v. O'ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Gilmer v. HigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. Alexander SuttonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Sorenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Hass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.