Legal Opinion
Boege v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 16, 1975No. 75-73PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKuNzig, Judge
This is a civilian pay suit in which plaintiffs basically challenge the exercise of Department of Defense (DOD) discretion in determining the in-port per diem rates for Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVOCEANO) personnel. DOD now authorizes payment of shipboard per diem rates for the first three days a NAVOCEANO vessel is in any port outside the Continental United States (CONUS), with higher locality per diem rates permitted for all subsequent days in port. We fail to find any abuse of administrative discretion and conclude plaintiffs are not entitled to locality per diem rates for their first…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Leonard J. Ganse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whelan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Filipczyk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Filipczyk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983