Legal Opinion

Robert Wehrle v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 8, 2013No. 12-3052PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TINDER, Circuit Judge.

When Heike Wehrle and Robert Wehrle were severely injured in an auto accident with a drunk-driver carrying minimal insurance, they contacted their own insurance company, Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati), invoking the underinsured-motorist provision of their policy. Cincinnati paid them the difference between their $1 million coverage limit (their combined injuries exceeded this amount) and the $200,000 that they had received from the at-fault driver’s insurer. The Wehrles sued, claiming that they were owed the full $1 million. The district court granted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elizabeth C.O. Bellaver v. Quanex Corp./nichols-HomeshieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Central Illinois Light Co. v. Home InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Nicor, Inc. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Illinois Emcasco Insurance Company v. TufanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  2. Essex Insurance v. Rho Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Lloyd's Syndicate 3624 v. Biological Res. Ctr. of Ill., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. HodgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Anderson v. American Body CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API