State ex rel. Mullen v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Original Application for Prohibition.
1Per curiam
Relator had obtained judgment in his favor in a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, to test the title to an office, and thereunder had been placed in possession of the office. Thereafter the defendant in the proceeding, having perfected his appeal to this court, sought an order in the superior court requiring the relator to surrender possession of the office that he might again take possession thereof. To prohibit the superior court from taking such action this proceeding was instituted.
The grounds upon which it was alleged that the superior court was about to make the order were,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Ætna Insurance v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Kawabe v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Gust v. GustWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Inland Nursery & Floral Co. v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.