Legal Opinion

Inland Nursery & Floral Co. v. Rice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1909No. 8426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court October 25, 1909, for a writ of prohibition to the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., to restrain the hearing of a motion to modify an injunction, pending an appeal therefrom.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant brought an action against the respondents in which it sought to recover certain shares of its capital stock, which it alleged the respondents, while acting as trustees of the appellant, had wrongfully caused to be issued to themselves. As a part of its relief, it sued out a temporary injunction enjoining the respondents from disposing of or encumbering the stock, or from voting or otherwise representing the same at any of the corporate or stockholders’ meetings of the corporation. When the cause came *22on for final hearing before the superior court, that court ruled that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Irving v. IrvingWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Mullen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Kane v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State ex rel. Sanglin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State Ex Rel. School District No. 56 v. KlecknerOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Service v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Phillips v. Wenatchee Valley Fruit ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Kawabe v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API