Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Fisk

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 31, 1967No. 1 CA-CIV 280PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The issue before us relates to the decision of the trial court sustaining the real estate broker’s motion for summary judgment granting a commission.

Merlin Fisk is a duly licensed real estate broker. He was the successful plaintiff in the trial court. Russell J. Madsen and Marjorie G. Madsen, his wife, owned a motel in Flagstaff at the time in question. They were the unsuccessful defendants in the trial court and will hereinafter be referred to as “Madsen”. Douglas O. Fox and Dorothy I. Fox, his wife, owned some apartment properties in Phoenix. They will hereinafter be referred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Arizona Coffee Shops, Inc. v. Phoenix Downtown Parking Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Young v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. EnglerArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Weber v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Challenge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Hegel v. O'Malley Ins. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Taylor v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API