Legal Opinion

Picciotto v. Zabin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 2001No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners appeal, under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from a single justice’s denial of a request for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. The petitioners had sought review of an order of a Superior Court judge denying a “motion to quash the notice of taking deposition” of their attorney, and of an Appeals Court single justice’s denial of relief under G. L. c. 231, § 118, first par.

We treat the denial of the motion to quash as interlocutory for purposes of rule 2:21 (1). We must now consider whether the petitioner has, as rule 2:21 (2) requires, “set forth the reasons why review…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mirrione v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Addison v. BelayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Doe v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Nordberg v. Department of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API