Legal Opinion

Mirrione v. Jacobs

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 13, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, Charles M. Mirrione, appeals from the denial of his petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. We affirm.

Mirrione is a defendant in a civil action pending in the Superior Court in which Michael Jacobs, Gerald Wine, and Seamus Kelly (plaintiffs) are challenging the issuance of a special permit and definitive subdivision approval. Pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, Mirrione moved in the Superior Court for an order requiring each plaintiff to post a cash or surety bond to secure court costs. The Superior Court judge denied the motions. A single justice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greco v. Plymouth Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Picciotto v. ZabinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iagatta v. IagattaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Guzzi v. Secretary of Public SafetyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Hudson v. Superintendent, Mass. Corr. Inst.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Giamarco v. RuggieroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API