Charles Hewitt & Sons Co. v. Keller
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.
There is no substantial dispute as to overpayment of the tax; in fact, the defendants-appellants, who constitute the board of supervisors of Polk county and who will hereafter be referred to as the board, tacitly, if not expressly, admit that the provisions of section 7164 of the Code were ignored and that as a result plaintiff-appellee was called upon to and did pay at least the amount for which decree was rendered in its favor in excess of the amount due if the deduction provided for in the cited statute had been made. '
We pass for the moment the question of whether the cited statute is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of EqualizersSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- McSurely v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- First National Bank v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Polk County Iowa v. Iowa State Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Maryland Classified Employees Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Bd. of Sup'rs of Linn Cty. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.