Legal Opinion
Davis v. Houghtellin
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1891PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Error to the district court for Jefferson county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited cases referred to in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This is a proceeding in error to reverse the judgment of the district court of Jefferson county, sustaining a general demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff, and dismissing the action. The petition alleges:
“First — That she is administratrix of the estate of Daniel C. Davis, deceased, duly appointed according to law.
“Second — That the defendants are partners in trade, doing business as such at Fairbury, in said county, under the firm name and style of Houghtellin & McDowell.
*583“ Third — That on or about the 28th day of March, A. I). 1888, said defendants were in the possession of certain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Carter v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Meehan v. MorewoodNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Tuller v. VoghtIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- De Camp v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Savannah Electric Co. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Bowler v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Sullivan v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. RueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.