Legal Opinion

People v. Moses

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 2011No. G044482PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Summary of Conclusions, Holding, and Reason for Publication

Defendant John Stuart Moses was convicted of a single count of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a). He challenges his conviction, and *376many of the probation conditions imposed by the trial court. We conclude substantial evidence showed defendant acted with the specific intent to gratify his own or the victim’s sexual desires, and the trial court did not err in modifying the standard jury instruction on unanimity.

We hold that several of the probation conditions are unconstitutionally overbroad because they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. FarellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. In re Alexander T. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API