People v. Moses
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Summary of Conclusions, Holding, and Reason for Publication
Defendant John Stuart Moses was convicted of a single count of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a). He challenges his conviction, and *376many of the probation conditions imposed by the trial court. We conclude substantial evidence showed defendant acted with the specific intent to gratify his own or the victim’s sexual desires, and the trial court did not err in modifying the standard jury instruction on unanimity.
We hold that several of the probation conditions are unconstitutionally overbroad because they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. FarellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Alexander T. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.