Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 2012No. B236858PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1182Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Jesse Moore appeals his convictions for attempted second degree robbery and misdemeanor vandalism. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude a probation condition prohibiting Moore from owning, possessing, or using dangerous or deadly weapons is not unconstitutionally vague, and need not be modified to include a knowledge requirement. In the unpublished portion, we conclude the evidence was sufficient and the prosecutor did not commit prejudicial misconduct. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. Edward B.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. Kevin F.California Court of Appeal · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API