People v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1182Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Jesse Moore appeals his convictions for attempted second degree robbery and misdemeanor vandalism. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude a probation condition prohibiting Moore from owning, possessing, or using dangerous or deadly weapons is not unconstitutionally vague, and need not be modified to include a knowledge requirement. In the unpublished portion, we conclude the evidence was sufficient and the prosecutor did not commit prejudicial misconduct. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
I.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. Edward B.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Kevin F.California Court of Appeal · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.