Legal Opinion

Sayles v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1918No. Docket No. 139Published

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Summary proceedings by Frank Sayles against George E. Murphy for the possession of certain leased premises. Plaintiff had judgment of restitution before the commissioner, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a summary proceeding to recover the possession of lands, commenced before a circuit court commissioner, where plaintiff recovered judgment. Upon removal of the case to the circuit court a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff and a judgment duly entered. The case is brought here by writ of error.

We quote from the brief of counsel for the appellant:

“The questions involved relate chiefly to the error of the trial court in allowing conflicting claims of title to be litigated and determined in summary proceedings, when'the plaintiff’s sole and appropriate remedy, if any, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. BertrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Green v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Chapman v. NehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Tefft v. TefftMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API