Tefft v. Tefft
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Gage (William G.), J. Summary proceedings by John G. Tefft and others against Charles B. Tefft for the possession of certain real estate. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and complainants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action brought under subdivision 1, § 11164, 3 Comp. Laws. The complaint was made in due form, the complainants being John G. Tefft, Sarah J. Tefft, Arethusa C. Faucett, and Tacitus P. Zander, by Tacitus P. Zander on his own behalf and as agent for the other complainants. A summons was issued in the name of complainants. Upon motion made before the commissioner, the name of Arethusa C. Faucett was stricken from the complaint and summons. Just when this was done does not appear in the record. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and gave notice of special defense, which was, in effect,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lindsey v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Pettit v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Holbrook v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Hilbourn v. FoggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sayles v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918