Legal Opinion

Graham v. Stoneham

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1963No. 7263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ, Justice.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract. Defendants-appellants, Johnny Robert Stoneham and Martha J. Stoneham, hereinafter referred to as “vendees,” entered into an agreement with plaintiffsappellees, J. D. Graham and Willadene Graham, hereinafter referred to as “vendors,” for the purchase of the surface of certain lands and all improvements, including an auto-wrecking business consisting of equipment and all parts and supplies, both new and used, all used cars located in the wrecking yard, and the right to use a Certificate of Public Convenience No. 1070 for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Powers v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Zazzaro v. Colonial Acceptance CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Smith v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. HandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Knoebel v. Chief Pontiac, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buckingham v. RyanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Armstrong v. CsurillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API