Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. David

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1947No. 458PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

This appeal arises from a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff granted on defendant’s opening statement. Plaintiff sued for possession of premises leased to defendant as a rooming house on the ground of non-payment of rent, and, as permitted by Code 1940, § 45 — 911, also demanded judgment for accrued rent for three months beginning December 1, 1945, at $100 per month. Defendant filed an answer, a counterclaim and a so-called cross-claim. In the answer she alleged she was not indebted for the rent because plaintiff had not made repairs, which she claimed constituted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Graffam v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Danielson v. Bank of ScandinaviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hackney v. Morelite ConstructionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Stamenich v. MarkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Luther Williams, Jr., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Warner Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. BostonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API