Mitchell v. David
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
This appeal arises from a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff granted on defendant’s opening statement. Plaintiff sued for possession of premises leased to defendant as a rooming house on the ground of non-payment of rent, and, as permitted by Code 1940, § 45 — 911, also demanded judgment for accrued rent for three months beginning December 1, 1945, at $100 per month. Defendant filed an answer, a counterclaim and a so-called cross-claim. In the answer she alleged she was not indebted for the rent because plaintiff had not made repairs, which she claimed constituted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Graffam v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Danielson v. Bank of ScandinaviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hackney v. Morelite ConstructionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Stamenich v. MarkovicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Luther Williams, Jr., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Warner Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. BostonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.