Legal Opinion

Cool Insulation, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided December 8, 1998No. SA-97-CA-138 HGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

H.F. GARCIA, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered the motion filed by Defendants Owens-Corning and Williams Consolidated, Inc. for summary judgment on the Robinson-Pat-man Act claims made by Plaintiff Cool Insulation, Inc. Having considered the same, and the response of the plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

From 1993 through 1996, the period at issue, Cool Insulation, Inc. (“Cool”) and Williams Consolidated, Inc. (“Williams”) were engaged in the business of insulation contracting in and around Austin, Texas. Insulation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. John J. Terrell, Plaintiff-Appelle v. Household Goods Carriers' BureauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API