Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1942No. 14174PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The amended petition seeks injunctive relief and cancellation of a deed. Both constitute disputes of the title of defendants Lewis and George. The entire amended petition immediately encounters the long-established and well-recognized principle of law found in the Code, § 61-107, which declares: “The tenant may not dispute his landlord’s title nor attorn to another claimant while in possession.” This rule estops the tenant from disputing his landlord’s title so long as he is in possession. It does not prevent him from attacking the title of his former landlord, but requires…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Willis v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Grizzard v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Johnson v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Tison v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  5. Tufts v. DuBignonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Partain v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Bowles v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Imperial Hotel Company v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Consolidated Realty Inv. Inc. v. GasqueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Toombs v. HilliardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API