Bowles v. White

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) As shown by our statement of facts, the court sustained a motion in the nature of a general demurrer and struck the defendant’s. answer and cross-action, and for these reasons we think that the judgment complained of is erroneous:(a) It was held by this court in Banks v. Howard, 117 Ga. 94 (43 S. E. 438): “Contracts under which one of the contracting parties agrees with the other, for a valuable consideration, that he will make a will giving to the other property, either real or personal, have been sustained and enforced in America from…