Legal Opinion

Imperial Hotel Company v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1945No. 15227PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) A demurrer to a petition for injunction may be heard and determined by the judge at an interlocutory hearing and before the appearance term. Code, § 81-1002; Wilder v. Thompson, 169 Ga. 812 (151 S. E. 806); Ward v. Parks, 166 Ga. 149 (142 S. E. 690); Meena v. Piedmont Realty Co., 173 Ga. 844 (162 S. E. 144); Hardin v. Baynes, 198 Ga. 683 (32 S. E. 2d, 384).

It is insisted by counsel for the plaintiff in error that in the present proceeding the purpose of the defendant in error was to seek the shelter of equity in order to avoid the necessity…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Gray Lumber Co. v. GaskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Burrus v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Hardin v. BaynesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Hall v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. DolinoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Local Union No. 3871 v. FortnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Dumas v. BurleighSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Carmichael v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Dumus v. RenfroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API