Legal Opinion

State v. Glover

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1985No. 8521SC125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

By his sole assignment of error, the defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for mistrial, when the motion was based on the admission of defendant’s criminal record by incompetent and highly prejudicial evidence which violated the defendant’s constitutional right to remain silent. We disagree.

Defendant’s only assignment of error is based on two exceptions. However, the exceptions do not appear in the record except under the purported assignment of error. These exceptions are worthless and will not be considered on appeal. Holden v. Holden, 245…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. RolandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API