W. T. Smith Lumber Company v. Cobb
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Complainant brought this suit pursuant to the provisions of § 3, Title 47, Code of 1940, to determine the boundary line between itself and respondent, coterminous landowners. The trial court established as the true line that claimed by the respondent, and complainant appeals.
It is first contended by complainant, appellant, that the trial court erred in refusing, on its motion, to order a survey of the lines as provided by § 10, Title 47, Code of 1940. Complainant offered to deposit with the register the money necessary to defray the expenses of the survey. The argument is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Chastang v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Kidd v. BrowneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Stansell v. TharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Long v. LaddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Bearden v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Mardis v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- James v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.