Legal Opinion

Missouri Moline Plow Co. v. Render

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 15, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

In the spring of 1918, appellee, W. P. Render, who was plaintiff below, purchased of Boyle & Atherton, local merchants, one model 0 Universal farm tractor, which they warranted to develop a specified horsepower on the belt and at the drawbar, and do certain work in plowing and harrowing ground. Alleging that Boyle & Atherton made the sale and warranty as .agents of the appellant, *775Missouri Moline Plow Company, and that the tractor was not as warranted, Render instituted this action against the plow company, and recovered a judgment against it for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Church v. Wright Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Williams v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. DudderarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Vaughn v. Shady Grove Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Kaufman-Straus Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. J. B. Colt Company v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. White Motor Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API